براکیوپد-Brachiopoda
Brachiopoda
A phylum of solitary, 
exclusively marine, coelomate, bivalved animals, with both valves symmetrical 
about a median longitudinal plane. Brachiopods are typically attached to the 
substrate by a posteriorly located cuticle-covered stalk called a pedicle. 
Anteriorly, a relatively large mantle cavity is always developed between the 
valves, and the ciliated tentacular (filamentous) feeding organ, or lophophore, 
is suspended within, projecting anteriorly from the anterior body wall (Fig. 1). 
The name Brachiopoda means “arm foot” and refers to the morphology and location 
of the lophophore. 
Fig. 1  Principal organs of a brachiopod as 
typified by Terebratulina. (After R. C. Moore, ed., Treatise on Invertebrate 
Paleontology, pt. H, Geological Society of America, Inc., and University of 
Kansas Press, 1965)

 
 
 
This brief description 
serves to differentiate a brachiopod from any other animal. Within the 
Brachiopoda, three groups currently regarded as subphyla are recognized, each 
named after their most ancient living representative: Linguliformea, 
Craniiformea, Rhynchonelliformea. Phoroniformea are recognized by some as a 
fourth subphylum. The two classes (Inarticulata and Articulata), formerly 
distinguished by the presence or absence of articulation between the two valves 
of the shell, are no longer recognized as distinct taxa; rather, they appear to 
represent the ends of a spectrum of articulatory types, some well delineated, 
others less so. Rhynchonelliforms have impunctate, endopunctate, or 
pseudopunctate calcitic shells with a fibrous (or laminar) shell structure; most 
are articulated, with the valves typically hinged together by a pair of ventral 
teeth with complementary sockets in the dorsal valve; most have pedicles with a 
core of connective tissue. Craniiforms have punctate calcitic shells with a 
laminar (or tabular) shell structure; all lack articulation, with valves that 
are held together only by the soft tissue of the living animal, and all lack 
pedicles. Linguliforms have canaliculate organophosphatic shells with a 
stratiform shell structure; all lack articulation; and all have pedicles with a 
coelomate core.  See also: 
Inarticulata; Lingulida; Rhynchonelliformea 
Phylogeny and 
classification
Molecular sequence 
data from nuclear and mitochondrial genes in extant brachiopods provide strong 
support for brachiopods as protostomous organisms, and not deuterostomes, as 
some earlier morphological and developmental data seemed to suggest. These data 
also indicate that the Phoronida is nested within the Brachiopoda, and is not 
the brachiopod sister group, as previously thought. Lophophorates alone do not 
appear to form a clade; the Bryozoa are more distantly related within the 
Lophotrochozoa, a rather poorly resolved clade that also includes mollusks and 
annelids, among other phyla (Fig. 2). Only approximately 5% of named brachiopod 
genera (and most likely, species) are extant; most of our current understanding 
of brachiopod phylogeny results from a composite of molecular data from a small 
taxonomic sample, and morphological (and stratigraphic) data from a much larger 
sample of extinct fossil taxa.  See 
also: Bryozoa; Phoronida; Rhynchonelliformea 
Fig. 2  Phylogenetic relationships among 
selected metazoans. (Simplified from K. M. Halanych and Y. Passamaneck, Amer. 
Zool., 41:629–639, 2001; K. M. Halanych, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Sys., 
35:229–256, 2004; and B. L. Cohen and A. Weydmann, Organisms, Diversity and 
Evolution, 5(4):253–273, 2005)

 
 
 
The phylum is 
currently classified as follows: 
Subphylum 
Linguliformea 
  Class 
Lingulata 
    Order: 
Lingulida 
          Siphonotretida 
          Acrotretida 
  Class 
Paterinata 
    Order 
Paterinida 
Subphylum Craniiformea 
  Class 
Craniata 
    Order: 
Craniida 
          Craniopsida 
          Trimerellida 
Subphylum 
Phoroniformea (?) 
Subphylum 
Rhynchonelliformea 
  Class 
Chileata 
    Order: 
Chileida 
          Dictyonellida 
 Class 
Obolellata 
    Order: 
Obolellida 
          Naukatida 
  Class 
Kutorginata 
    Order: 
Kutorginida 
  Class 
Strophomenata 
    Order: 
Strophomenida 
          Billingsellida 
          Orthotetida 
          Productida 
  Class 
Rhynchonellata 
    Order: 
Protorthida 
          Orthida 
          Pentamerida 
          Rhynchonellida 
          Atrypida 
          Spiriferida 
          Spiriferinida 
          Thecideida 
          Athyridida 
          Terebratulida
 
 
Orientation
The two brachiopod 
valves are currently referred to as the dorsal and ventral valves, not brachial 
and pedicle, because not all brachiopods possess pedicles. This body orientation 
distinguishes them from bivalved mollusks, which have valves on the left and 
right sides of the body. While topologically dorsal and ventral in adults, their 
developmental orientation is not entirely clear; both valves of some extant 
craniiforms may derive from the dorsal surface of the developing, modified 
trochophore larva. The pedicle either protrudes between the valves (through the 
delthyrium and notothyrium, which are small triangular apertures serving as 
pedicle openings), or (Fig. 3) more commonly emerges from a variably modified 
opening (pedicle foramen) in the ventral valve, which, in articulated forms, is 
the valve bearing the hinge teeth. Whatever the form of the pedicle opening, it 
is always at the posterior end of the animal and its enclosing shells, the 
opposite end being regarded as anterior. Both valves have a characteristic 
distribution of muscles, and any skeletal support for the lophophore is 
invariably developed from the dorsal valve (Fig. 4). 
Fig. 3  Diagrammatic representation of the 
external features of a generalized brachiopod seen in (a) posterior, (b) left 
lateral, (c) dorsal, and (d) dorsolateral views. (After R. C. Moore, ed., 
Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, pt. H, Geological Society of America, 
Inc., and University of Kansas Press, 1965)

 
 
 
Fig. 4  Generalized representation of 
distribution of epithelium in relation to other tissues and organs in (a) 
lingulides and (b) terebratulides. (After R. C. Moore, ed., Treatise on 
Invertebrate Paleontology, pt. H, Geological Society of America, Inc., and 
University of Kansas Press, 1965)

 
 
 
 
Anatomy
The pedicle is the 
only organ protruding outside the valves, for the remainder of the animal is 
enclosed in the space between them. This space is divided into two unequal 
parts, a smaller posteriorly located body cavity and an anterior mantle cavity. 
The ectodermal outer epithelium underlying the shell bounding the body cavity is 
in a single layer; but anteriorly, laterally, and even posteriorly in most 
inarticulated brachiopods, it is prolonged as a pair of folds forming the 
ventral and dorsal mantles, from which the shells are mineralized (at the 
generative zones). In extant species, the two mantles approach each other and 
ultimately fuse along the posterior margin of rhynchonelliform brachiopods; in 
contrast, the mantles are invariably discrete in craniiforms and linguliforms, 
and are separated by a strip of body-wall inner epithelium (Fig. 4). 
The body cavity 
contains the musculature; the alimentary canal; the mixonephridia, which are 
paired excretory organs also functioning as gonoducts; the reproductive organs; 
and the rather poorly understood circulatory and nervous systems. Except for the 
openings through the mixonephridia, the body cavity is enclosed, but the mantle 
cavity communicates freely with the sea when the valves are opened. The 
lophophore is a feeding and respiratory organ, typically suspended from the 
anterior body wall within the mantle cavity, and is always symmetrically 
disposed about the median plane. The lophophore consists of a ciliated, 
filament-bearing tube with two arms in varying configurations. The ciliary beat 
produces a laminar flow of water into and then out of the mantle cavity, flowing 
across the filaments while inside. The latter trap food particles which are 
carried along a groove in the lophophore to the mouth situated medially between 
the two arms.  See also: Lophophore 
The alimentary canal 
of all brachiopods is broadly similar in structure, but differs in orientation 
in the body cavity. The mouth opens into a muscular tube, the esophagus, which 
continues to a stomach and intestine. In addition, there are a variable number 
of digestive diverticula that communicate with the stomach through narrow ducts 
(Fig. 1). In rhynchonelliform brachiopods, the intestine curves into a C-shape 
and ends blindly (with no anus) in a posteroventral location; in linguliforms, 
it curves into a U-shape, leaving the anus right-lateral or ventrolateral; in 
phoronids, it is also U-shaped, but the anus is anterodorsal; in craniiforms, 
the intestine is straight and does not curve or fold, leaving the anus 
medioposterior. 
The diductor and 
adductor muscles that control the opening and closing of the valves are 
contained within the body cavity (Fig. 1), but their distribution varies among 
the three brachiopod subphyla. In most rhynchonelliforms, they are disposed to 
effect a rotation of the valves about a hinge axis located on the valves; in 
craniiforms and linguliforms, the hinge axis is located in the viscera between 
the valves; in selected linguliforms, the two valves can “scissor” past one 
another, allowing burrowing in a soft substrate. Adjustor muscles effect 
movement of the shell relative to the pedicle, and other muscles may be present 
that can move the lophophore slightly relative to the valves. Because of a 
differential rate of secretion of shell material by the epithelium at the bases 
of the muscles, the site of muscle attachment is commonly impressed in the 
valves, producing muscle scars. Rarely, the muscle scars may be elevated above 
the adjacent shell. 
Although some 
small-bodied species are herma-phroditic and brood their larvae, the sexes are 
separate in the majority of brachiopods. The gonads, or reproductive organs, are 
located either within the body cavity (as in the lingulids and discinids) or 
more typically in slender tubelike extensions of the body cavity which project 
into the mantle, called the mantle canals (in craniids and rhynchonelliforms). 
The mantle canal pattern may be retained on the inner surface of the valves, 
even in fossils, by processes of differential secretion comparable with those 
producing the muscle scars. 
Given the phylogenetic 
nesting of phoronids within brachiopods, the anatomy of Phoronida can be 
interpreted as having evolved from a brachiopod body plan; phoronid anatomy is 
modified largely as a reflection of the loss of the two mineralized valves.  See also: Phoronida 
 
Embryology and 
ontogeny
Linguliforms, 
craniiforms, phoronids, and rhynchonelliforms share numerous aspects of 
embryogenesis and larval development, yet each has distinct characteristics not 
shared with any others (Fig. 5). Extant linguliforms and phoronids are 
planktotrophic and have likely remained so from their origin in the Cambrian (or 
earlier); extant craniiforms and rhynchonelliforms are lecithotrophic, and have 
each evolved independently from a planktotrophic ancestral state. Planktotrophic 
larvae remain in the water column for weeks to months, while lecithotrophic 
larvae remain in the water column only briefly, usually less than a week; these 
differences have important implications for the timing of differentiation of 
adult structures, and for the ability of the larvae to disperse 
biogeographically. Planktotrophic brachiopods develop more structures as larvae, 
prior to metamorphosis, and lecithotrophs develop more structures following 
metamorphosis, as young juveniles. Shell deposition begins at metamorphosis in 
all three subphyla, although mantle formation can begin during embryogenesis or, 
more commonly, during the larval growth period, just prior to metamorphosis. 
Fig. 5  Comparison of fate maps and selected 
developmental stages of the three brachiopod subphyla and Phoroniformea, 
considered by some to be a fourth brachiopod subphylum. (a) Fate maps of 
uncleaved eggs. (b) 16-cell embryos. (c) Late gastrula stage. (d) Lateral views 
of the early larva. (Reprinted from G. Freeman, Developmental Biology, 
261:263–287, 2003, with permission from 
Elsevier)

 
 
 
Larvae in all three 
subphyla share a three-part body organization: an apical lobe, from which the 
lophophore differentiates in the larval stage of linguliforms and immediately 
following metamorphosis in craniiforms and rhynchonelliforms; a mantle lobe, 
from which the mantle (on which the periostracum and shells later mineralize), 
alimentary canal, and most of the viscera develop; and a pedicle lobe, from 
which the pedicle develops in linguliforms during the larval stage, and in 
rhynchonelliforms following settlement and metamorphosis. In rhynchonelliforms 
alone, the mantles are reversed after metamorphosis so that they are oriented 
anteriorly, partially covering what was the apical lobe of the larva, and with 
the original inner surface of the mantle forming the outer surface of the 
organism. The mantles subsequently secrete the earliest, first-formed shell, the 
protegulum, which enlarges by terminal accretion during later shell growth. Only 
after metamorphosis does the rudimentary lophophore, alimentary canal, and adult 
musculature develop. Rhynchonelliforms and phoronids share many aspects of 
embryogenesis (Fig. 5a–c), providing further support for genetic data suggesting 
they evolved among brachiopods. Craniiforms do not develop pedicles or a larval 
pedicle lobe, but the larvae settle at their posteriormost ends, comparable to 
where a pedicle lobe would be located. Craniiforms do not undergo mantle 
reversal. 
Linguliform larvae are 
much like miniature adults that undergo minimal morphological change at 
metamorphosis, having developed most of their adult features while larvae in the 
plankton. The two mantle rudiments are separated from each other early in larval 
life, and are not fused along the posterior margin in the manner characteristic 
of rhynchonelliform brachiopods. 
 
Shell morphology
The two valves are 
commonly of unequal size, with the ventral valve typically larger. Because the 
shell increases in size by increments laid down at the mantle margin, 
ontogenetic changes in shape are faithfully recorded by growth lines. The valves 
may be further ornamented by concentric folds (rugae), growth lamellae, or 
radially disposed ribs of various amplitude and wavelength. Numerous extinct 
genera are characterized by extravagant development of spines. In 
rhynchonelliforms, the posterior region of one or both valves is commonly 
differentiated from the remainder of the valve as a somewhat flattened cardinal 
area. The ventral area is typically further modified by the pedicle opening; 
among articulated brachiopods this consists of a triangular delthyrium which may 
be partially closed by a pseudodeltidium or a pair of deltidial plates. A 
corresponding triangular opening, the notothyrium, may be developed on the 
dorsal cardinal area. Internally, muscle scars and mantle canal impressions may 
be apparent, together with structures of varying complexity associated with 
articulation (for example, dental and socket plates) and support of the 
lophophore (crura, spiralia, loops). Calcite spicules are present in the mantle 
tissues of some extant terebratulides. Linguliform valves are less heavily 
mineralized and more organic-rich than rhynchonelliforms. Extant craniiforms, 
cemented to a hard substrate, have ventral valves that are flat and extremely 
thin, with gently cap-shaped dorsal valves. 
Shell morphology 
varies considerably externally in overall shape and size, relative biconvexity, 
and degree of ornamentation. Shell morphology also varies internally in 
structures involved in articulation, lophophore support, and muscle position, 
from order to order, among the 26 orders recognized. This extensive variation 
makes it difficult to succinctly characterize overall trends.  See also: Rhynchonellida; Terebratulida 
 
Ecology and 
biogeography
All modern brachiopods 
are marine, and there is little doubt from the fossil record that brachiopods 
have always been confined to the sea. A few genera, however, notably the closely 
related linguliform brachiopods Lingula and Glottidia, can tolerate reduced 
salinities and may survive in environments that would be lethal to the majority 
of forms. Recent brachiopods occur commonly beneath the relatively shallow 
waters of the continental shelves, which seem to have been the most favored 
environment in terms of diversity and abundance, but the bathymetric range of 
the phylum is very large. Some modern species live intertidally and, at the 
other extreme, some have been dredged from depths of over 16,500 ft (5000 m). 
The majority of 
brachiopods form part of the sessile benthos and are attached by their pedicle 
during postlarval life. Paleozoic brachiopods not uncommonly exhibit boreholes 
penetrating their shells, suggesting death by boring predation; interestingly, 
modern brachiopods have very few known predators, boring or otherwise, even 
though most are epifaunal, typically living on hard substrates. Glottidia and 
Lingula are exceptional in being infaunal and making burrows with the help of 
complex musculature connecting the two valves that lack articulation. The loss 
of the pedicle has occurred multiple times over the course of brachiopod 
evolution, by either complete suppression or atrophy early in the life of the 
individual. Such forms lie free on the sea floor, are attached by cementation of 
part or all of the ventral valve, or are anchored by spines. The geographic 
distribution and geological setting of some fossil species suggest that they may 
have been epiplanktonic, attached to floating weed, but such a mode of life is 
unknown in modern faunas. 
Biogeographically, 
brachiopods today exhibit an antitropical distribution, with their highest 
diversity closer to the Poles than to the tropics, and higher in the Southern 
Hemisphere than the Northern Hemisphere. Paleobiogeographical data from the 
distribution of fossil species indicate that Paleozoic brachiopods exhibited a 
more typical latitudinal diversity gradient, with high tropical diversity, 
decreasing toward the polar regions, such as is observed today in the majority 
of marine invertebrates. 
 
Taxonomic diversity and stratigraphic 
distribution
Brachiopods formed a 
major part of skeletonized marine faunas throughout the Paleozoic; linguliforms 
follow a pattern of diversity through time more or less typical for the Cambrian 
Evolutionary Fauna described by J. J. Sepkoski, while rhynchonelliforms typify 
the Paleozoic Evolutionary Fauna. The oldest undoubted brachiopods, the 
paterinates, occur in the Lower Cambrian Tommotian stage. Representatives of 
seven of the eight classes are known from the Lower Cambrian, indicating that 
morphological diversity was high even very early in the history of the phylum. 
Throughout the Cambrian, linguliforms were more abundant than rhynchonelliforms; 
but during the Early Ordovician radiation, rhynchonelliform diversity and 
abundance both increased dramatically and remained high until the end-Permian. 
In the late Paleozoic, a number of major brachiopod groups became extinct, and 
the end-Permian extinction event caused diversity to plummet. Four of the five 
extant orders survived this extinction event, and rediversified, although much 
more modestly through the Mesozoic and Cenozoic than in the Paleozoic. In the 
present-day oceans, approximately 120 genera are recognized, dominated by 
rhynchonelliforms (terebratulides and rhynchonellides in particular).  See also: Extinction (biology); 
Paterinida; Rhombifera 
S. J. Carlson 
A. J. Rowell 
 
Bibliography
S. J. Carlson and M. R. 
Sandy (eds.), Brachiopods Ancient and Modern: A Tribute to G. Arthur Cooper, 
Paleontol. Soc. Pap. 7, 2001 
R. L. Kaesler (ed.), 
Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, pt. H: Brachiopoda (revised), 6 vols., 
Geological Society of America and 
M. J. S. Rudwick, Living 
and Fossil Brachiopods, 
 
Additional 
C. H. C., Brunton, L. R. 
M. Cocks, and S. L. Long (eds.), Brachiopods Past and Present: Proceedings of 
the Millennium Brachiopod Congress, 2000, Systematics Ass. Spec. Vol. Ser. 63, 
S. J. Carlson, 
Phylogenetic relationships among extant brachiopods, Cladistics, 11:131–197, 
1995 
B. L. Cohen and A. 
Weydmann, Molecular evidence that phoronids are a subtaxon of brachiopods 
(Brachiopoda: Phoronata) and that genetic divergence of metazoan phyla began 
long before the Early Cambrian, Organisms, Diversity & Evolution, 
5(4):253–273, 2005 
P. Copper and J. Jin 
(eds.), Brachiopods: Proceedings of the Third International Brachiopod Congress, 
Sudbury, Ontario, Canada, 2-5 September 1995, A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 1996 
G. Freeman, Regional 
specification during embryogenesis in Rhynchonelliform brachiopods, Dev. Biol., 
261:268–287, 2003 
Paleopolis 
Tree of Life Web Project 
	  این وبلاگ تمامی موضوعات و مقالات و اطالاعات تخصصی زمین شناسی را که از سایتهای علمی جهان برگرفته شده در اختیار بازدیدکنندگان محترم قرار می دهد.گفتنی است که مطالب موجود در این وبلاگ در نوع خود بی نظیر بوده و از هیچ وبلاگ ایرانی ای کپی برداری نشده است و اگر هم شده منبع آن به طور کامل ذکر شده است.